StockEducation
Bank Financial Statements

Chapter 12 · Part 12 — Regulatory, Governance and Market Terms

AML, FATF, governance and share market data

Why anti-money-laundering is a business-continuity issue in Nepal, and why a share trading on 64 days weakens every price ratio.

41 of 51 · 14 min

FATF Grey List

Simple definition. An international watchlist of countries with weaknesses in their anti-money-laundering systems.

Technical definition. The Financial Action Task Force's list of "Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring" — countries that have committed to resolve identified strategic AML/CFT deficiencies within agreed timeframes and are subject to increased monitoring.

The report names it as an external challenge:

Why it matters to a bank's economics — the correspondent-banking chain.

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  A NEPALI BANK CANNOT OPERATE INTERNATIONALLY ALONE.             │
│                                                                  │
│  To settle a USD import letter of credit, or to receive a        │
│  remittance from the Gulf, Malaysia or Korea, it needs a         │
│  CORRESPONDENT BANK abroad to hold its nostro account and        │
│  clear the currency.                                             │
│                            │                                     │
│                            ▼                                     │
│  Grey listing → foreign correspondents apply ENHANCED DUE        │
│  DILIGENCE to Nepali institutions:                               │
│     • Slower processing                                          │
│     • Higher compliance cost passed through                      │
│     • More transactions queried or declined                      │
│     • Risk of "DE-RISKING" — the correspondent simply            │
│       terminating the relationship                               │
│                            │                                     │
│                            ▼                                     │
│  IF CORRESPONDENT RELATIONSHIPS WERE LOST:                       │
│     x Import LCs could not be issued  → LC commission gone       │
│       (Part 8.E.17)                                              │
│     x Remittances could not be received → remittance fee gone    │
│       (Part 8.E.13) — and remittance is a large share of         │
│       Nepal's GDP                                                │
│     x Trade finance would stop                                   │
│     x FX trading income would collapse (Part 2.8)                │
│                                                                  │
│  ⇒ This is an EXISTENTIAL OPERATIONAL RISK, not a                │
│    compliance formality.                                         │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Analyst implication. When assessing any Nepali bank, treat AML/CFT capability and correspondent-banking relationships as a rated risk factor, alongside credit and liquidity. A bank's fee income from remittance and trade finance is contingent on them.

Related terms. 12.20 · Part 2.4, 2.8 · Part 8.E.13, 8.E.17 · Part 10.7

Corporate Governance

Simple definition. The system by which the bank is directed and controlled, and held accountable.

Technical definition. The framework of board structures, committees, policies, internal controls, compliance functions and disclosure practices through which an institution is governed, prescribed for BFIs by NRB directives and by the Companies Act 2063.

The report's own statement, in full:

The governance architecture, assembled from the whole report.

                   ┌─────────────────────┐
                   │    SHAREHOLDERS     │
                   │   Promoter · Public │
                   │         AGM         │
                   └──────────┬──────────┘
                              │ elect
                   ┌──────────▼──────────┐
                   │   BOARD (7)         │
                   │   20 meetings       │
                   │   1 Independent     │
                   └──────────┬──────────┘
     ┌──────────────┬─────────┼─────────┬──────────────┐
     ▼              ▼         ▼         ▼              ▼
┌─────────┐  ┌───────────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌────────┐  ┌──────────┐
│ AUDIT   │  │   RISK    │ │  HR  │ │ ASSETS │  │  OTHER   │
│   (5)   │  │    (6)    │ │ (4)  │ │LAUNDER-│  │   (2)    │
│         │  │           │ │      │ │ING (7) │  │          │
│ chaired │  │  chaired  │ │chair-│ │        │  │          │
│ by NED  │  │  by NED   │ │ed by │ │        │  │          │
│         │  │           │ │ NED  │ │        │  │          │
└─────────┘  └───────────┘ └──────┘ └────────┘  └──────────┘
                              │
                   ┌──────────▼──────────┐
                   │ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE │
                   │ CEO + 6, incl. a    │
                   │ Chief Risk Officer  │
                   └──────────┬──────────┘
                              │
         ┌────────────────────┼────────────────────┐
         ▼                    ▼                    ▼
┌────────────────┐  ┌──────────────────┐  ┌────────────────┐
│ ALCO           │  │ COMPLIANCE DEPT  │  │ INTERNAL AUDIT │
│ Asset-Liability│  │ incl. Corporate  │  │ (reports to    │
│ management     │  │ Governance Unit  │  │ Audit Cttee)   │
└────────────────┘  └──────────────────┘  └────────────────┘

Underpinned by: Code of Conduct and Ethics (12.23)

The evidence base for assessing governance quality — assembled across Parts 10, 11 and 12.

SignalEvidenceRead
Board activity20 meetings + 24 committee meetingsActive
Independence3 committees chaired by non-executives; 1 independent directorPresent, thin !
Connected lending**Nil loans to promoters**Clean
Risk focusChief Risk Officer on ExCo; Risk Cttee 6 meetingsAppropriate
AML priorityMost frequent committee (7 meetings)Matches the FATF risk
CandourManagement analysis names NPA rise explicitlyGood disclosure
Legal exposure"No material cases except regular debt recovery and Income Tax"Clean
External disciplineFMO and Employees Provident Fund on the boardPositive
CEO accountabilityPersonal responsibility statement signedRequired, present

Related terms. 12.23, 12.24 · Part 10 (entire) · Part 11

Code of Conduct and Ethics

Definition. The bank's internal policy setting expected standards of behaviour for directors and employees — covering conflicts of interest, confidentiality, insider trading, gifts and entertainment, fair dealing, and whistleblowing.

The report's reference: "There are number of policies and procedures in place, including the Code of Conduct and Ethics to ensure highest level of compliance standard within the Bank."

Why it matters in a bank specifically. Employees have access to customer funds, confidential credit information and unpublished price-sensitive information about listed borrowers. The code is the first line of defence against insider dealing, front-running and misuse of customer data — none of which is caught by any financial ratio.

Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO)

Simple definition. The management committee that manages the balance sheet — matching what the bank owns against what it owes.

Technical definition. A senior management committee responsible for managing the structure of the balance sheet: interest rate risk, liquidity risk, funding strategy, pricing, and the maturity and repricing profile of assets and liabilities.

What ALCO actually decides — and where you see its decisions in this report.

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  ALCO DECISION                    VISIBLE IN                     │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Deposit pricing and mix          Cost of Funds 3.74%            │
│                                   (fell 132bp) — Part 6.5        │
│                                                                  │
│  Lending rate / base rate         Base Rate 5.11% — Part 6.7     │
│                                   Spread 3.43% — Part 6.8        │
│                                                                  │
│  How much to lend vs invest       CD ratio 82.77% — Part 6.6     │
│                                   NPR 19bn into securities       │
│                                   — Part 1.8, 4.15               │
│                                                                  │
│  Liquidity buffer size            NLA 28.99% — Part 6.16         │
│                                                                  │
│  Wholesale funding reliance       Due to BFIs down NPR 3.2bn     │
│                                   — Part 1.18, 11.9              │
│                                                                  │
│  FX and derivative position       Matched derivative book        │
│                                   — Part 1.4                     │
│                                                                  │
│  Funds transfer pricing           Intersegment revenue           │
│                                   — Part 9.9                     │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Reading NMB's year through an ALCO lens. The decisions cohere:

Grow deposits (+13.1%) faster than loans (+10%)
      → CD ratio falls to 82.77%, creating headroom
Deploy the surplus into government securities (+NPR 19bn)
      → NLA rises to 28.99%, RWA impact minimal
Repay interbank borrowing (−NPR 3.2bn)
      → funding quality improves
Let deposit rates fall with the market
      → cost of funds down 132bp, NII up 17.5%

⇒ A DEFENSIVE, LIQUIDITY-BUILDING year — entirely rational
  given rising NPL and thin CET1. ALCO ran this balance
  sheet conservatively.

That is a coherent and defensible strategy, and it is only visible when you read the balance sheet, cash flow and ratio table together as ALCO would.

Why ALCO is management, not board. Unlike Audit, Risk and HR — which are board committees chaired by non-executive directors — ALCO is an executive committee. It makes operational balance-sheet decisions within a risk appetite the board sets.

Related terms. Part 6.5–6.8, 6.16 · Part 1.4, 1.8, 1.18 · Part 9.9 · 12.22

SHARE MARKET DATA

Maximum Price / Minimum Price / Closing Price

Simple definition. The highest, lowest and final traded prices of the bank's share during the period.

The disclosure, as published:

Maximum Price  – 257      Minimum Price – 230      Closing Price – NPR 239.50
Trading number – 8,289    Days of Trading – 64

What each is used for.

MeasureUse
**Maximum / Minimum**Trading range — a crude volatility indicator
**Closing Price**The input to **PE ratio** (Part 6.13) and Price-to-Book

Working the numbers.

TRADING RANGE
   Range        = 257 − 230 = NPR 27
   As % of min  = 27 ÷ 230  = 11.7%
   → A narrow band. Not a volatile period for this share.

PE RATIO (Part 6.13)
   Bank EPS  NPR 20.18  →  239.50 ÷ 20.18 = 11.87  OK matches
   Group EPS NPR 28.47  →  239.50 ÷ 28.47 =  8.41  x does not
   ⇒ CONFIRMED: the published PE uses STANDALONE EPS

PRICE-TO-BOOK
   Net worth per share (Bank)  NPR 181.15
   P/B = 239.50 ÷ 181.15 = 1.32×
   → The market values the bank at 1.32× its book equity.

DIVIDEND YIELD (cash only)
   Cash dividend 5% on NPR 100 par = NPR 5.00 per share
   Yield = 5.00 ÷ 239.50 = 2.09%

TOTAL DISTRIBUTION YIELD (cash + stock, at par)
   NPR 10.00 ÷ 239.50 = 4.18%

Related terms. Part 6.13, 6.14 · 12.26 · Part 11.1

Trading number / Days of Trading

Simple definition. How many transactions took place, and on how many days the share actually traded.

The disclosure:

Trading number    8,289
Days of Trading      64

What these numbers actually tell you — and this is the most under-appreciated disclosure in the report.

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  DAYS OF TRADING = 64                                            │
│                                                                  │
│  A Nepali fiscal year has roughly 240 trading days                │
│  (allowing for weekends and Nepal's many public holidays).       │
│                                                                  │
│  64 ÷ ~240 = the share traded on roughly 27% of                  │
│  available days.                                                 │
│                                                                  │
│  ⇒ ON ABOUT THREE DAYS IN FOUR, THIS SHARE DID NOT TRADE.        │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  TRADING NUMBER = 8,289 transactions                             │
│  8,289 ÷ 64 = ~130 trades on each day it did trade               │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Four consequences an analyst must draw from this.

1. THE CLOSING PRICE IS A WEAK SIGNAL
   A price set on 27% of days by ~130 trades carries far less
   information than a continuously-traded share. Treat the
   PE ratio and P/B accordingly — they are indicative, not
   precise.

2. LIQUIDITY RISK FOR INVESTORS IS REAL
   A large holder cannot exit quickly without moving the price.
   This is a genuine cost of holding Nepali bank shares that
   no financial ratio captures.

3. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY IMPLICATIONS
   "Quoted price in an ACTIVE market" is the Level 1 test
   (Part 8.C.10). A share trading on 27% of days may not
   meet it — which is part of why Nepali banks' equity
   holdings often sit at Level 2 or 3.

4. IT EXPLAINS THE FVOCI ELECTION
   With thin, volatile pricing, running NEPSE fair value
   changes through profit would make reported bank earnings
   swing on illiquid price marks. The irrevocable FVOCI
   election (Part 3.4) insulates the P&L — and NMB used it,
   taking a NPR 937 million adverse swing entirely outside
   profit and EPS.

Cross-reference to the report's own statement: "As the open market share operations determines the market price and transaction of the Bank's shares, the Bank Management is neutral on the ruling share price of the Bank."

Related terms. 12.12 NEPSE · 12.25 · Part 6.13 · Part 3.4 · Part 8.C.10

Part 12 — Revision table

TermWhat it isWhy it matters here
Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB)Central bank and BFI supervisorWrites the **accounting overlay** on top of NFRS [R]
Unified DirectivesNRB's consolidated rulebookSource of every [R] in this guide
Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 2006The banking statuteCreates the class structure, capital and reserve rules
Class "A" financial institutionFull commercial bankNMB's licence; highest requirements [R]
Class "D" financial institutionMicrofinance (Laghubitta)Funded by parent lending; weaker asset quality
ICANIssues standards and **carve-outs**An IFRS answer ≠ the Nepali answer
NASBDevelops NFRS/NASNASB writes; ICAN pronounces
SEBONCapital market regulatorLicenses the merchant bank and broker subsidiaries
Securities Registration and Issuance Regulation, 2073SEBON disclosure regulationSource of the six-part disclosure section
Securities Businessperson (Merchant Banker) Regulations, 2008Merchant banker licensingNMB Capital's licence
Companies Act, 2063General company lawCapital redemption reserve, AGM, share premium [R]
Nepal Stock Exchange LimitedThe only exchangeThin trading shapes fair value and PE reliability
Annual General Meeting (AGM)Shareholder meeting**AGM approval** creates the dividend liability
Promoter / Public ShareholderTwo-class ownershipMakes the connected-lending prohibition enforceable [R]
Independent DirectorUnaffiliated board member1 of 7 — present but thin
Merchant and investment bankingCapital-market servicesMust be a separate SEBON-licensed subsidiary
Share brokerage businessTrade executionVolume-driven, capital-light, Group column only
Non-Performing Assets (NPA)Same as NPL4.91%, up from 4.11% — management says so
Capital Adequacy RatioCapital ÷ RWAFamily name — **always specify the layer**
AML/CFT complianceAnti-money-laundering frameworkMost board committee time of any area
FATF Grey ListIncreased-monitoring listThreatens correspondent banking → remittance and LC income [R]
Corporate GovernanceDirection and controlNil connected lending; thin independence layer
Code of Conduct and EthicsBehavioural policyControls what no ratio reveals
Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO)Balance-sheet management**Its decisions are what Part 6 measures**
Maximum / Minimum / Closing PriceShare price dataClosing NPR 239.50 → PE 11.87 on **standalone** EPS
Trading number / Days of TradingLiquidity data**64 days only** — every price-based ratio is a thin signal

Saved in this browser only — there is no account to create. Clearing your browser data clears your progress.