Chapter 2 · Week 2 — Which Return Is Mine? D-01, D-02, D-03 and D-04
Which Return Is Mine? D-01 to D-04
The decision tree from person type to form, and the arithmetic that decides between the presumptive route and full self-assessment.
2 of 8 · 8 min
The Income Tax folder in the portal offers four entry doors. Choosing the wrong one wastes a filing, and in a bad case produces a return that understates or overstates tax and has to be revised. This week is the decision.
2.1 The four doors
INCOME TAX MODULE — the entry doors ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ D-01 Return Entry the simplest return │ │ D-02 Return Entry the presumptive / turnover-based route │ │ D-03 Return Entry the full self-assessment return │ │ D-04 Return Entry the specialised return │ │ │ │ Jeopardy Assessment ← not a routine filing (Week 8) │ │ Change of Control ← an event, not a period (Week 8) │ │ Close of Business ← D-01 / D-02 / D-03 variants (Week 8) │ │ Tax Return Login ← the LOGIN door for all of them │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Notice what the tree tells you before you read a word of law: the close-of- business forms exist for D-01, D-02 and D-03 but not D-04. That is a structural hint about which forms describe ongoing businesses.
2.2 The decision tree
┌──────────────────────────┐
│ Who is filing? │
└───────────┬──────────────┘
│
┌─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┐
▼ ▼
┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ NATURAL PERSON │ │ ENTITY │
│ (an individual) │ │ (company, firm) │
└────────┬────────┘ └────────┬────────┘
│ │
┌────────┴────────┐ │
▼ ▼ ▼
income is income includes full accounts,
employment / BUSINESS audited where
simple only income required
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌──────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ D-01 │ │ small turnover? │ │ D-03 │
└──────┘ │ │ │ └──────────────┘
│ yes │ no │
▼ ▼ │
┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ │
│ D-02 │ │ D-03 │ │
└──────┘ └──────┘ │
presumptive full │
/ turnover accounts │
D-04 sits outside this flow — it is the specialised return
for cases the other three do not describe. [R]2.3 What each form is really for
┌───────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ D-01 │ THE SIMPLE RETURN │ │ │ A natural person whose income is straightforward │ │ │ — typically employment, and other income that │ │ │ needs no set of business accounts. │ │ │ │ │ │ What it needs: income, the deductions and │ │ │ reliefs claimed, tax already withheld. │ │ │ What it does NOT need: a balance sheet. │ ├───────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ D-02 │ THE TURNOVER / PRESUMPTIVE ROUTE │ │ │ A small business taxed on a simplified basis │ │ │ rather than on computed profit. │ │ │ │ │ │ The trade: far less bookkeeping, but you give up │ │ │ the ability to deduct actual expenses. Only worth │ │ │ it if your real margin is HIGHER than the │ │ │ presumed one — see 2.5. │ ├───────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ D-03 │ THE FULL SELF-ASSESSMENT RETURN │ │ │ Business income computed from accounts: │ │ │ revenue, deductible expenses, depreciation, │ │ │ losses, adjustments, taxable income, tax. │ │ │ │ │ │ Most companies and most substantial firms. │ │ │ This is the form Week 4 walks through. │ ├───────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ D-04 │ THE SPECIALISED RETURN │ │ │ For cases the first three do not fit. [R] │ │ │ If you are not certain D-04 is yours, it is │ │ │ almost certainly not. │ └───────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2.4 The question that decides D-02 versus D-03
This is the only genuinely hard choice on the tree, and it is an arithmetic question, not a preference.
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ D-03 tax ≈ (revenue − allowable expenses) × rate │ │ └──────── actual profit ────────┘ │ │ │ │ D-02 tax ≈ turnover × presumptive basis [R] │ │ └── no expense deduction at all ──┘ │ │ │ │ Choose D-02 only when it produces LESS tax AND you │ │ are eligible. Eligibility comes first; the arithmetic │ │ only decides among options you actually have. │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Worked example — the same shop, two routes.
ILLUSTRATIVE. Rates and the presumptive basis are set by the
Finance Act; substitute the ones in force. [R]
A retail shop, one fiscal year:
Turnover Rs 3,000,000
Cost of goods sold Rs 2,400,000
Rent, wages, other allowed costs Rs 400,000
─────────────
Actual profit Rs 200,000
Real margin = 200,000 / 3,000,000 = 6.7 %
ROUTE A — D-03, taxed on actual profit
Taxable income Rs 200,000
Tax = 200,000 × (slab rate) ← low base
ROUTE B — D-02, taxed on turnover
Tax = 3,000,000 × (presumptive rate) ← large base,
small rate
THE BREAK-EVEN
D-02 is cheaper when:
turnover × presumptive rate < profit × profit rate
Rearranged, D-02 wins when your REAL MARGIN is HIGH:
profit/turnover > presumptive rate ÷ profit rate
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ The intuition, and it is counter-intuitive: │
│ │
│ A turnover tax punishes LOW-margin businesses and │
│ rewards HIGH-margin ones. A shop grinding out 6% net │
│ on Rs 3 million is usually better off on D-03, where │
│ its costs are actually deducted. A consultant with an │
│ 80% margin and almost no costs is usually better off │
│ on the presumptive route. │
│ │
│ Compute both before choosing. Once chosen, changing │
│ route has its own rules. [R] │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘2.5 The cost of choosing wrong
WRONG FORM, TWO DIRECTIONS
Filed D-02 when D-03 was required
→ the return does not carry the accounts IRD expects
→ assessment risk, and a revision to file
Filed D-03 when D-02 was available and cheaper
→ the return is VALID and ACCEPTED
→ you simply paid more tax than you needed to
→ nobody will tell you
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Note the asymmetry. The tax system will stop you │
│ from under-declaring. It will not stop you from │
│ over-declaring. The second mistake is silent, and │
│ it is the more common one among small filers. │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘2.6 The three inputs every income tax return needs
Whichever door you take, the return reconciles three quantities.
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ 1. TAX ON INCOME computed from the return │ │ │ │ 2. TAX ALREADY PAID withheld at source (TDS) │ │ + advance instalments │ │ + any earlier payment │ │ │ │ 3. THE DIFFERENCE payable, or refundable │ │ │ │ BALANCE = (1) − (2) │ │ │ │ positive → you pay before the deadline │ │ negative → a credit / refund position [R] │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
That identity is the spine of every return in the portal. Everything else is the work of getting line (1) right.
Worked example — the settle-up.
ILLUSTRATIVE.
Tax computed on the return Rs 185,000
Less: TDS certificates held Rs 120,000
Less: advance instalments paid Rs 40,000
────────────
Balance payable Rs 25,000
Now the two ways this goes wrong in practice:
(a) A TDS certificate is missing.
You claim 120,000 but only 95,000 is visible against
your PAN in the system. The return shows 25,000 due;
IRD's records show 50,000. The gap becomes a notice.
→ RECONCILE TDS TO THE SYSTEM, NOT TO YOUR FILE.
(b) An instalment was paid but the voucher never attached.
Same failure, different module — and it is exactly what
Payment Voucher Search in Week 1 is for.2.7 Getting the person type right
Because it drives everything, it is worth stating the distinctions plainly.
┌────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ NATURAL PERSON │ An individual. May have employment │ │ │ income, business income, or both. │ │ │ Personal reliefs apply. │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ PROPRIETORSHIP │ A business owned by one natural │ │ │ person. NOT a separate taxpayer — │ │ │ its income is the owner's income. │ │ │ This confuses people constantly. │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ PARTNERSHIP / │ An entity. Files in its own right. │ │ FIRM │ │ ├────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ COMPANY │ An entity. Separate legal person, │ │ │ entity rates, full accounts. │ └────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────┘ THE TRAP: a sole proprietor sometimes files as if the shop were a separate taxpayer. It is not. The proprietor files ONE return covering personal and business income together, and personal reliefs sit on the same return.
Formulas from this week
Balance on any income tax return
= tax computed − (TDS + advance instalments + prior payments)
D-02 vs D-03 break-even [R]
D-02 cheaper when:
turnover × presumptive rate < profit × profit rate
equivalently, when:
actual margin > presumptive rate ÷ profit rate
Actual margin = profit ÷ turnoverWhat you should be able to do now
- Name the four income tax entry doors and what each is for.
- Walk the decision tree from person type to the correct form.
- Explain why a turnover-based tax favours high-margin businesses.
- Compute the D-02 versus D-03 break-even for a real set of figures.
- Explain the asymmetry between filing the wrong form in each direction.
- State the balance identity every return reconciles.
- Explain why a sole proprietorship is not a separate taxpayer.
Next week: filing a D-01 end to end — a natural person, from payslips to submission number.
Saved in this browser only — there is no account to create. Clearing your browser data clears your progress.